CNA Newsletters

Subscribe!

Dear Neighbor,

Please consider subscribing today to this grass roots community e-newsletter.

BANA continues to bring you years of residents prospective on what is happening in our neighborhoods citywide, City Hall or at the State level which may impact your neighborhoods quality of life.

Sincerely,

Marie Bowman
California and Blake Neighborhood Association and BANA

Are you interested in joining us? Click here for the subscription form. Print it and return the form to the address indicated.
Thank you for supporting our community newsletter!

Articles

How do I publish an Article in theBANAe- Newsletter?

BANA encourages residents of Berkeley to submit articles for consideration in the newsletter regarding issues which may impact their neighborhoods, letters to the editors or City public service announcements to BANA via email at info@berkeleyana.org.


City Budget and Ballot Measure Information

This is prepared by BASTA! and can be found on www.berkeleytax.org

CNA September Newsletter

This will be mailed this week. Watch for both interesting and educational information on the state of the City's budget and the November Ballot Measures.

CNA October Newsletter

Articles are being accepted for the October newsletter through Friday, 10/1/04. Please email articles to cna-bana@berkeleycna.org.


Panoramic Interests Saga of Coffer Draining, Carpetbagging and Profiteering Continues . . .

  • Reports Cite Chill Between Developer, UC Prof Backer
    Richard Brenneman, Berkeley Daily Planet, 8/6/2004
  • David Teece: Big Building Backer,  Academic Guru, Political Power Player and a Corporate Tycoon
    Richard Brenneman, Berkeley Daily Planet, 8/6/2004

  • This report, published by the Urban Land Institute, makes it clear that "smart growth" is about money - not about preserving the greenbelts. 95% of development is still expected to occur over greenfields.

    • Full Report:  greenfield.dev_.pdf
    • This important report proves that inclusionary zoning drives up the price of housing in two ways: It forces middle-class buyers to subsidize the poor, and it discourages new housing and increases the bidding wars for the few houses that are being built.
      by Greg McConnell

      Greg McConnell
      Rental Housing Consultant
      (510) 245-0500 / (916) 498-3348
      www.themcconnellgroup.com
      S.F. Chronicle on April 15, 2004. Kelly Zito, Chronicle Staff Writer ©2004 San Francisco Chronicle

      This report was published by HUD in February of this year. Older, existing housing is less expensive than newly developed housing. Razing communities for redevelopment makes the area's housing stock less affordable than it had been prior to demolition and replcaement.


      Jerry Brown's Contaminated and Crowded Downtown and . . .
      Deconstructing the "Affordable Housing" Scam


      (Abstract)
      Written by: Anne Wellington
      http://www.awellington@wellingtonvisuals.com
      © All Rights Reserved

      Unbridled profiteering, future political careers, and environmental loopholes foster public policy in Oakland. While headlines decry budgetary woes, and residents reel under deficit spending, the truth lurks beneath, unreported and festering. Oakland's budget for smart growth and affordable housing development was generously augmented in FY2003. Mayor Brown and the Oakland Redevelopment Agency - doubling as the City Council - set aside millions to entice investment bankers, real estate moguls, and large-scale national development conglomerates to capitalize on an open invitation to exploit this unprecedented opportunity to build with public funding, without environmental constraints, without permitting restrictions, and without limitations on the amount of new construction approval. Held hostage by a self-serving governing body with conflicting public and private interests, Oakland's residents will live with Jerry Brown's despotically imposed legacy long after the politicians, developers and investment bankers are finished speculating, making their fortunes, buying their own homes in the hills or pristine countryside, warehousing the poor within the densely crowded and polluted urban core, and moving on from Oakland to their next capital ventures.